Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Jul 1997 11:37:23 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith)
Cc:        imp@rover.village.org, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, pechter@lakewood.com, terry@lambert.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Boot file system idea! Slick
Message-ID:  <199707221837.LAA13746@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <199707220530.PAA27322@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Jul 22, 97 03:00:20 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > So I think it is a cool idea, so long as it isn't mandatory :-)
> 
> The problem is that if it's not mandatory, there's no point in doing
> it.  If we support reading from ufs filesystems anyway, there's
> nothing really gained from having FAT support.  This is why I can't
> understand Bruce suggesting Yet Another Filesystem just for the
> bootstrap.

Well, it would help with the MIPS, PPC, and Alpha ports, for sure.
The PReP spec requires a DOS partition table, though it allows 32
bit sector offsets.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707221837.LAA13746>