Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 11:48:29 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, sprice@hiwaay.net Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (FWD) Re: Progs linked against libstdc++ dead... Message-ID: <19990430114829.B95710@nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <199904300552.WAA14825@vashon.polstra.com>; from John Polstra on Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 10:52:50PM -0700 References: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9904291305480.2845-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net> <199904300552.WAA14825@vashon.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> These are good questions, and I don't know enough yet about the issues > surrounding vtable thunks to answer them. I haven't had time to really dig into this yet. Hopefully Saturday. I'm about to revert the change until I can see what the problem is and what the upgrade issues will be. EGCS 1.2 *should* be out in the July/Aug time frame. Of course I will try to upgrade us to it (well 1.2.1 which I figure will quickly follow). The EGCS maintainers are pushing to get vtable thunks working properly for 1.2. Since the Linux config files specify DEFALUT_VTABLE_THUNKS=1, no one has posted a bug report related to them, there is an option to turn them off, and this *is* -CURRENT. I may just leave them turned on by default. Opinions? -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990430114829.B95710>