Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 23:45:55 -0100 From: ".VWV." <victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: ufs and ext Message-ID: <200304252345.55600.victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it> In-Reply-To: <3EA9B589.AAD7A527@mindspring.com> References: <200304250203.28738.victorvittorivonwiktow@interfree.it> <3EA9B589.AAD7A527@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 25 April 2003 21:24, you wrote: > ".VWV." wrote: > > I have noticed both BSD and Linux pre-compiled kernels cannot mount > > read-write the other filesystem. It's a shame that a newbie could thi= nk > > one is able to read, the other one is able to write. We know ufs was = born > > before ext. Some Linux distributions has also adopted ReiserFS on Lin= ux, > > that's really a not-unix filesystem. Why at PASC nobody has declared > > what's the best standard? > > Everyone has declared their own as being "the best standard", > so no one interoperates. 8-). > > As to defaults, the issue is one of License conflicts. The > GPL is poison-pilled against all other licenses, in clause 6. > You can, of course, compile your own kernel with whatever code > you want in it, in both Linux and BSD, so long as you do not > distribute a binary that can't legally be licensed. > > If you go with the "least common denominator", e.g. FAT32, > then both systems can mount the FS read/write, no problem, > though that's probably not very satisfying to you. > > -- Terry It's horrible, we could fear we have no Gods any more... I'll never move = from=20 ufs or from an hypothetical future 'son'. I have been really tried by=20 not-properly-unix experiments. =2EVWV.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304252345.55600.victorvittorivonwiktow>