Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 12:51:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Adrian T. Filipi-Martin" <atf3r@cs.virginia.edu> To: FreeBSD commercial support <supporters@nanyang-computer.com> Cc: FreeBSD Chat <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: BSD copyrights Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980413124329.19329G-100000@mamba.cs.Virginia.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199804130939.CAA03635@implode.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, David Greenman wrote: > >Somebody suggested that BSD was a copyright of BSDI. > > It is. Their disclaimer is incomplete. > > -DG BSDi didn't exist until well after "BSD UNIX" was in common usage in the technical community and is commonly used today to refer to a generic class of services and OS's. Did BSDi buy "BSD" from UCB? Maybe I'm forgetting something, but isn't this the same situation as nylons/stockings, xerox/photocopy, kleenex/facial tissue, etc.? The term predated BSDi and applies to a genneral class of software. It seems an untenable position to me. I'm not arguing that we have the resources to do anything about it, but it doesn't seem like they can claim ownership either. Which was first out of the gate, 386BSD or BSD/386? Adrian -- adrian@virginia.edu ---->>>>| If I were stranded on a desert island, and System Administrator --->>>| I could only have one OS for my computer, Neurosurgical Visualization Lab ->>| it would be FreeBSD. Think about it..... http://www.nvl.virginia.edu/ ->| http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.96.980413124329.19329G-100000>