Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:14:07 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defrag Message-ID: <es7tp0$aal$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <2dac75d59286fc9c0481d6dc7ca29e16@prodigy.net> References: <539c60b90703010849x33dd4bbbt8f6ca6aa0c8e83a0@mail.gmail.com> <es7gv6$3is$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070301165055.638b0a06.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <es7im6$9tu$1@sea.gmane.org> <44r6s8y4o5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <es7ln0$jff$1@sea.gmane.org> <2dac75d59286fc9c0481d6dc7ca29e16@prodigy.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD5B944E9585FFEF8B9D807CA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable jekillen wrote: > a Mac disc. I am just curious as to how the HFS and HFS+ file systems f= it > into this picture. Particularly since OSX is essentially a Unix 'like' > system > but still uses HFS+ > Just for some perspective and idle curiosity. As you said, HFS(+) is not a native unix file system, but maybe someone will know about it. All I know about is that HFS+ is a journaling file system and that it defragments (in the Windows sense) files smaller than certain size (20MB?) on the fly. --------------enigD5B944E9585FFEF8B9D807CA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF53pfldnAQVacBcgRAr5XAJ4oAL2IyM7xYi1q8uZ6GD9B2wWthwCdFX+w vlgc2jxMHJFwdXpR+l7nOSg= =dvki -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD5B944E9585FFEF8B9D807CA--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?es7tp0$aal$1>