Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:00:26 +0200 From: "Wolfram Schneider" <wosch@FreeBSD.org> To: "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org>, doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs.freebsd.org missing newer release docs Message-ID: <f625a9de0804260500gf836303x1b7e356aaadfcffc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200804250742.12109.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200804231715.11458.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200804240811.51105.jhb@freebsd.org> <20080424185829.2be51cfa.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <200804250742.12109.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:42 PM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > FYI, http://docs.freebsd.org/doc doesn't have the documentation for > > > > > the 6.3 and 7.0 releases. The basic idea of http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/ is to have an archive of our documentation. > > > The handbook links to it in the first page, so if it is deprecated the > > > link should be removed. > > > > This text: > > > > (previous versions of this handbook can be obtained from <ulink > > url="http://docs.FreeBSD.org/doc/"></ulink>). > > > > from book.sgml makes me think that's where we could go for "older" > > versions of the handbook. The Handbook itself should cover > > the latest releases. If there is some ambiguity, then it should > > be fixed. ;) or "past versions" or "historic versions" ;-) > If that were the case surely 6.2 would be recent enough to be covered, yet 6.2 > is on the docs machine. :) It seems that the docs from each release are > saved on that machine and that someone(tm) just hasn't done it for 6.3 and > 7.0 yet. I've no idea who "someone" is though. thats me. -Wolfram -- Wolfram Schneider <wosch@FreeBSD.org> http://wolfram.schneider.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f625a9de0804260500gf836303x1b7e356aaadfcffc>