Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 23:40:53 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NO MORE '-BETA' Message-ID: <p0501040eb6d895cfe585@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20010316211106.A34611@spawn.nectar.com> References: <20010316173503T.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <XFMail.010316181429.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20010316211106.A34611@spawn.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:11 PM -0600 3/16/01, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: >Along these lines ... am I the only one who thinks that >the branch _needs_ to be called BETA at this time? Speaking only for myself, I do not think there is any need for it to be called 'beta'. Not when we're just going from one release of stable into the next one. Stable also breaks when it is not in this "beta stage" of the release cycle. Problems during beta? Yes, occasionally. Unusually serious ones? No. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0501040eb6d895cfe585>