Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 08:16:40 +0200 From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, dwcjr@inethouston.net Subject: Re: ports/27662: ports/security/openssh Update Message-ID: <uQJdRXseFt@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <088301c0ea0d$52dd8ea0$931576d8@inethouston.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > Would the portable version of openssh be easier to maintain instead of this > openbsd specific one. Here is a link to the portable openssh version which > is what I was porting before I came across this pr. > http://www.openssh.com/portable.html Sounds less work, but the Diffs to the Release is about 272K gzipped. I wouldn't like to audit this additional Code. 1127748 Jun 1 06:32 openssh-2.9p1-vs-openbsd.diff Most of the changes we need is in the makefiles. And those are very clean ... MAN => MAN1, pathnames ... A total of 14K. It was not that much work to merge the patches from OpenSSH 2.2.0 to 2.9, despite they moved a lot of code and added sftp. I vote for maintain the basic OpenSSH port. Gruß Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Tel 05606/6512 Q (voice) - Origin: DINOEX Habichtswald -FRG- [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?uQJdRXseFt>