Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      15 Mar 1999 20:11:51 +0100
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
To:        Donald Wilde <dwilde1@thuntek.net>
Cc:        freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: License nightmare
Message-ID:  <xzpogluo9e0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: Donald Wilde's message of "Mon, 15 Mar 1999 07:54:25 -0700"
References:  <36ED1F21.12E97D6D@thuntek.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Donald Wilde <dwilde1@thuntek.net> writes:
> If GNU gcc is GPL, is FreeBSD in violation, or is it just 'including
> source' and not 'using' that requires disclosure of sources?

Where did you get the idea that we did not distribute the gcc sources?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpogluo9e0.fsf>