Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 09:27:30 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/gnu/ext2fs ext2_vfsops.c src/sys/i386/i386 in_cksum.c src/sys/i386/include in_cksum.h src/sys/isofs/cd9660 cd9660_vfsops.c src/sys/kern sys_socket.c uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c uipc_syscalls.c uipc_usrreq.c ... Message-ID: <19970817092730.64315@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <199708161916.MAA11058@freefall.freebsd.org>; from Garrett Wollman on Sat, Aug 16, 1997 at 12:16:29PM -0700 References: <199708161916.MAA11058@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 16, 1997 at 12:16:29PM -0700, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> [snip]
> Log:
> Fix all areas of the system (or at least all those in LINT) to avoid
> storing socket addresses in mbufs. (Socket buffers are the one
> exception.) A number of kernel APIs needed to get fixed in order to
> make this happen. Also, fix three protocol families which kept PCBs
> in mbufs to not malloc them instead. Delete some old compatibility
> cruft while we're at it, and add some new routines in the in_cksum
> family.
cool ;-) so they are dynamically allocated, mbufs are static and
are dependend of maxuser ? Is this the advantage now or am I
mistaken ?
--
Andreas Klemm | klemm.gtn.com - powered by
Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD
http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/SMP.html
http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/benches.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970817092730.64315>