Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 00:01:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: bradley@dunn.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UUCP (important clarification) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971012000123.8026I-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199710110219.TAA10855@usr02.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
so what about mail queued to multiple domains? On Sat, 11 Oct 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > > sendmail's way of queueing mail is not compatible > > with ETRN. > > This is probably more accurate. > > It's actually a pretty simple hack to sendmail to name the file based > on the destination domain, and a little more complicated to make it > queue run only on that domain. > > Actually, I have a slightly different gross hack I've used to avoid > hacking the sendmail queueing itself (still have to hack ETRN, though): > > o Under cron, grep the domain(s) you ETRN for out of the header > entries in the queue, and move them to another (domain specific) > directory. > > o Connect the ETRN up for the domain so that it uses the > -oQ <domain specific directory> > > You just have to be sure to process it frequently enough (or at the > right times) to avoid introducing a delivery latency. > > Then ETRN never runs except on files queued for a particular domain. > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.971012000123.8026I-100000>