Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 16:43:49 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Rudolf Schreiner <ras@muc.de>, brian@worldcontrol.com Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Where is F_LOCK defined? Message-ID: <19980719164349.I435@freebie.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.980716001423.7554C-100000@phobos.muc.de>; from Rudolf Schreiner on Thu, Jul 16, 1998 at 12:25:22AM %2B0200 References: <19980715140148.A10804@top.worldcontrol.com> <Pine.BSF.3.91.980716001423.7554C-100000@phobos.muc.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, 16 July 1998 at 0:25:22 +0200, Rudolf Schreiner wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 1998 brian@worldcontrol.com wrote: > > > Where is F_LOCK or F_ULOCK defined? > > That's SYSV style record locking, check lockf(3C) e.g. on Solaris 2.6. > Lockf is not supported by BSD, I had the same problem when I ported > SESAME to FreeBSD (2.2.6). I used the lockf function from glibc, it seems to > work. lockf(3) was added to -CURRENT about the 8th July. The definitions are in unistd.h. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980719164349.I435>