Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 12:19:59 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: frank segner <frank@blabla.ip.lu>, "Stephen D. Spencer" <bsd-isp@artorius.sunflower.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INN 1.7.2 & Device Not Configured error Message-ID: <19980920121959.A13027@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <199809181428.QAA15115@blabla.ip.lu>; from frank segner on Fri, Sep 18, 1998 at 04:28:06PM %2B0200 References: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9809180745180.16417-100000@artorius.sunflower.com> <199809181428.QAA15115@blabla.ip.lu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 18, 1998 at 04:28:06PM +0200, frank segner wrote: > I know this might not be a very 'constructive' comment (with respect to the > problem) but have a look at inn-2.1; it runs circles around 1.7.2 (performance > wise) and you don't need any ccd stuff since it's using its > own "CNFS" (Cyclic News File System) Is there a certain reason, why 2.1 is available since July 98 and the information on the webserver still is based on 2.0 and pointing to snapshot releases ? -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980920121959.A13027>
