Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 15:30:43 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org> Cc: Dima Ruban <dima@best.net>, lyndon@execmail.com, woodford@cc181716-a.hwrd1.md.home.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mail.local Message-ID: <199812061330.PAA51640@greenpeace.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of " Thu, 03 Dec 1998 17:27:46 EST." <Pine.BSF.3.96.981203172323.14719A-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981203172323.14719A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote: > I would certainly like to move to K5, but that's not an insignificant > amount of trouble in terms of transitioning. Speaking of KerberosV, is > it likely that FreeBSD will shift to shipping K4 instead of K5 by default > at some point? K4 is the most common in all the environments I regularly > use (here at CMU anyway) but K5 certainly has advantages (including, I > believe, better support for multihomed hosts in the form of not using the > IP in tickets/authenticators?) > > I would guess that the transition would be easier now that we have PAM? With PAM it is dead easy. As soon as JDP is finished, I will bring in K5. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812061330.PAA51640>