Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 01:04:16 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, freebsd-chat <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: UCITA (Important) Message-ID: <4.2.2.20000123010329.01aba360@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20000122133716.J391@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> References: <4.2.2.20000121141100.019a6370@localhost> <4.2.2.20000121131307.01a32380@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001212105050.31653-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk. eu.org> <4.2.2.20000121141100.019a6370@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:37 PM 1/21/2000 , Greg Lehey wrote: >You'll get better acceptance of an article on UCITA if you don't >mention any other restrictive licenses. Why mention some restrictive licenses (e.g. the Microsoft EULAs) and not others (e.g. the GPL)? UCITA allows all of them to wreak havoc. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.2.20000123010329.01aba360>