Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:47:39 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "clemensF" <ino-waiting@gmx.net> Cc: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c Message-ID: <12209.961944459@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:18:40 %2B0200." <20000625001840.A1017@spotteswoode.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20000625001840.A1017@spotteswoode.de>, "clemensF" writes: >> Marius Bendiksen: > >> the various quota routines, rather than a (struct proc *). As I can see >> >from the code, chkdq(), for example, should rather be using an suser() >> check upon a process structure, than testing cred->cr_uid==0. Are there >> any objections to changing this? > >this should be more portable and future-save, right? Isn't there an issue with NFS server side ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12209.961944459>