Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 01:00:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Style Wars Message-ID: <200109300800.f8U800Z41709@earth.backplane.com> References: <XFMail.010927173631.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200109291802.f8TI2jd38468@earth.backplane.com> <3BB60D52.4A29F52E@elischer.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
:
:well what would your prefered style be?
:
There is no single style that adequately describes a human readable
format for structures. It depends on the structure. It is best to
leave it vague style.9. Even the stuff in style.9 right now in
regards to structures is mostly junk. Nobody follows any of it (except
maybe the guy who wrote it), and for good reason. Put a tab after
the 'struct' keyword in a field definition? Only if I really wanted
to make it unreadable!
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109300800.f8U800Z41709>