Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 09:49:11 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: FreeBSD hackers list <FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, nik@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Message-ID: <20010826094911.C3501@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200108260421.f7Q4LZK84037@intruder.bmah.org>; from bmah@FreeBSD.ORG on Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 09:21:35PM -0700 References: <20010824190806.A46103@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108241725.f7OHPfB50419@intruder.bmah.org> <20010824194405.A46482@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108241752.f7OHqox51679@intruder.bmah.org> <20010825001408.B47203@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108242311.f7ONBIt56794@intruder.bmah.org> <20010825083659.A51201@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108251457.f7PEvVW45896@intruder.bmah.org> <20010825174208.A1269@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108260421.f7Q4LZK84037@intruder.bmah.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 09:21:35PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 07:57:31AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> Haven't been to Macau...but there's lots of jade in Hong Kong too. :-)
One hour by fast boat, I was surprised. Worth visiting!
> openjade is a descendent of jade (I don't think jade is being developed
> anymore). For some reason, jade has some problems running on the Alpha.
> I asked nik once why we don't just use openjade for everything...I think
> the answer was that there were some issues with languages using
> multi-byte characters. Personally, I run openjade on most of my i386
> boxes (it's an option for that architecture).
>
> (These things are SGML parsers, BTW. That's about the extent of my
> knowledge.)
Right, this makes sense. It implies that multibyte chars will be dealt with
wrongly for the Alpha distrib..
> > > OK. Can you apply the following patch to Makefile.inc.docports? It's
> > > against HEAD but it should apply equally well to RELENG4 because the
> > > files (modulo CVS strings) are identical.
>
> [...time passes...report of apparent success...]
>
> Yay! OK, I'll commit this "soon" (kind of brain-dead right now, don't
> trust myself to do commits properly). If you get to it first, that's
> fine too.
OK.
> > You forgot the :-).. building all ports will take aeons (I suspect;
> > I would be surprised if it didnot)
>
> No...I just meant building the ports tree itself, not all of the
> packages. In other words, if you don't set "NOPORTS=YES", a complete
> ports tree gets checked out and tarred up for the distribution. The
> docproj ports get built out out of this ports tree, so the definition
> of ${MINIMALDOCPORTS} is moot. If you set "NOPORTS=YES", then only the
> ports in ${MINIMALDOCPORTS} get checked out of the repo, and that's
> where you (we?) got bitten.
O.. yes, makes sense.
--
| / o / / _ Arnhem, The Netherlands email: wilko@FreeBSD.org
|/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010826094911.C3501>