Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 00:35:21 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vfprintf.c Message-ID: <20011014003521.A6557@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20011014061413.4A1F73810@overcee.netplex.com.au> References: <20011013215052.A1551@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20011014061413.4A1F73810@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 11:14:13PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > Guys, > > > > Do we already have a "formal" solution for libc/stdio/vfprintf.c? > > I experimented with changing argtable to not store the addresses > > of the varargs (which fails on ia64), but to hold the values > > themselves and that works good. This is probably a pessimisation > > on i386; more so than on Alpha. An alternative is to not use the > > argtable at all. > > > > Is anybody taking a look at this? > > Doug already posted a patch which fixes it.. It should be committed. Yes, it should. I'm surprised it hasn't been done already. The patch is quite old... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011014003521.A6557>