Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 18:54:02 +0900 From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@iDaemons.org> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cp -l Message-ID: <86n0mycrb9.wl@daemon.musha.org> In-Reply-To: <p05200f01ba2b0e19660a@[128.113.24.47]> References: <86lm2jjsft.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <p05200f01ba2b0e19660a@128.113.24.47>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sun, 22 Dec 2002 01:39:01 -0500,
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> >What about cp -l a la GNU cp?
>
> Why would we want this, when we already have the 'ln' command?
> (I'm not saying we should not do this, I am just wondering what
> the advantage is)
Cp(1) has -R, and can do operations recursively. Maybe we can add the
fts(3) facilities to ln(1) instead, though.
--
/
/__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org
/ ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org
Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp
"I believe in what I see, I believe in what I hear,
I believe that what I'm feeling changes how the world appears."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86n0mycrb9.wl>