Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 07:53:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Drew Tomlinson <drew@mykitchentable.net> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_4_4 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0204290750010.62234-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <002d01c1ed3d$32272a20$6e2a6ba5@lc.ca.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
they aren't so naive.. they follow BSD SAs tremselves (and everything else they have in-house.) I'm basically just sayng.. "for as long as it's practical, keep teh 4.4 tree going as you've got custommers for it" When it bewcomes inpractical. then fine, but 'til then.... inthe end I may even take on adding hte patches to the 4..4 tree as I'd have to do it in house anyway... On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org> > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:32 PM > > > [snip] > > > We will be moving those on 4.1.1 to 4.4 so that they are all at the > same > > level, but we cannot move them up to 4.5 or 4.8 or whatever for > > at least another 18 months as they don't upgrade production systems > more > > than once on 2 years in general. > > Instead of calling it an "upgrade", call it a system "patch". It just > so happens that the RELENG_4_5 "patch" will ensure that the OS is up to > date on security issues and more! :) > > Cheers, > > Drew > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0204290750010.62234-100000>