Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:39:37 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> To: emulation@freebsd.org Cc: database@freebsd.org Subject: Oracle 9.2.0.1.0 upgraded to 9.2.0.5.0 can't parse linprocfs? Message-ID: <20041218083937.GA1253@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!
We were running Oracle 9i (9.2.0.1.0) with FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
(then 5.2.1-R, then 5.3-STABLE) for a year without a problem.
Lately he hit one of Oracle's internal bugs and were forced to upgrade
Oracle 9i upto 9.2.0.5.0 using patchset.
Upgrade went just OK, though I was forced to replace
/compat/linux/etc/redhat-release with new content for Oracle Installer
start to work: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon).
Now Oracle can't start properly. It seems it fails to parse
a file from linprocfs. kdump shows that it reads
/compat/linux/proc/10494/stat (where 10494 is a PID of newly started child)
and breaks immediately saying that sscanf is failed:
10476 oracle CALL open(0xbfbfb72c,0,0)
10476 oracle NAMI "/compat/linux/proc/10494/stat"
10476 oracle NAMI "/compat/linux"
10476 oracle NAMI "/compat/linux/proc/10494/stat"
10476 oracle RET open 10/0xa
10476 oracle CALL read(0xa,0xbfbfb764,0x3e7)
10476 oracle GIO fd 10 read 113 bytes
"10494 (oracle) 0 10493 10494 10494 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 311\
750656 25752 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"
10476 oracle RET read 113/0x71
10476 oracle CALL close(0xa)
10476 oracle RET close 0
10476 oracle CALL mincore(0xbfbfb6f0,0)
10476 oracle RET mincore 0
10476 oracle CALL close(0x6)
10476 oracle RET close 0
10476 oracle CALL open(0x5001a53c,0x8441,0x1b4)
10476 oracle NAMI "/compat/linux/home/oracle/9.2.0.1.0/admin/orcl/bdump"
10476 oracle NAMI "/home/oracle/9.2.0.1.0/admin/orcl/bdump/alert_ORCL.log"
10476 oracle RET open 6
10476 oracle CALL old.killpg(0x6,0xbfbfb6f4,0x2)
10476 oracle GIO fd 6 wrote 79 bytes
"skgpspawn failed:category = 27143, depinfo = 22, op = sscanf, loc = sk\
gpstime5
"
So I ask, does contents of /compat/linux/proc/10494/stat shown above
looks right? I do not have a RedHat box to compare format.
Perhaps, I should upgrade installed linux_base-7.1_7/linux_devtools-7.1
upto linux_base-8.0?
Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041218083937.GA1253>
