Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:39:54 +0200 From: Jose M Rodriguez <freebsd@wanadoo.es> To: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@FreeBSD.org.ua> Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Replacement candidate for urwfonts Message-ID: <200406132039.54157.freebsd@wanadoo.es> In-Reply-To: <20040613164640.GA71406@phantom.cris.net> References: <200406131801.20354.freebsd@wanadoo.es> <20040613164640.GA71406@phantom.cris.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El Domingo, 13 de Junio de 2004 18:46, escribi=F3: > Unfortunatelly no. I am in Germany right now and will be back in > month or so :( You may ask people on java mailing list for testing > of it and submit patch which conditionally will enable it with > jdk14 port. I afraid that I can't accept patches which are not > tested by me or any other expirienced in this area guys. > > Fonts and java is very instable relation :( I Know. But I can't work a patch against jdk. No skill on that. I can=20 only change the RUN_DEPENDS or make a how-to about making gsfonts the=20 only URW type1 fontpack and revert the changes. We are using URW Type1 fonts from three different sources and it seems=20 it matters to fontconfig (to closer fonts). So I'm trying to get only one source, gsfonts. I think it is now closer=20 enought to the URW fontpack from gimp to work. I'll wait for X.org and XFree86-4.4, so I can wait for jdk. I can't mail to @FreeBSD.org (my ISP fault). Can you forward this to=20 java@ if needed. Thanks for your time, =2D- josemi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406132039.54157.freebsd>