Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 01:31:10 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Who can commit this.. kse vs ULE Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403210125430.17893-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott here's the patch I mentioned...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:30:45 -0800
From: David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org>
To: Taku YAMAMOTO <taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for SCHED_ULE & libpthread issue (was Re: I like
SCHED_4BSD)
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:23:47AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
> Until the problem is fully addressed, I will propose following patch
> to be applied. (the least intrusive one attached in the former message)
Do people think we should commit this?
--- sched_ule.c.orig Fri Feb 13 05:24:48 2004
+++ sched_ule.c Fri Feb 13 05:37:53 2004
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
#define SCHED_INTERACTIVE(kg) \
(sched_interact_score(kg) < SCHED_INTERACT_THRESH)
#define SCHED_CURR(kg, ke) \
- (ke->ke_thread->td_priority != kg->kg_user_pri || \
+ (ke->ke_thread->td_priority < kg->kg_user_pri || \
SCHED_INTERACTIVE(kg))
/*
@@ -1166,11 +1166,8 @@
*/
if ((ke->ke_flags & KEF_ASSIGNED) == 0) {
if (TD_IS_RUNNING(td)) {
- if (td->td_proc->p_flag & P_SA) {
- kseq_load_rem(KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu), ke);
- setrunqueue(td);
- } else
- kseq_runq_add(KSEQ_SELF(), ke);
+ kseq_load_rem(KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu), ke);
+ setrunqueue(td);
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0403210125430.17893-100000>