Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 19:04:47 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, Chad Gross <avatar4d@gmail.com> Subject: Re: cvsup-advanced article Message-ID: <4388F81F.4030009@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <200511261346.26050.josh@tcbug.org> References: <17489c7a0511260006o156e9d81o6853e9c0a1e3b183@mail.gmail.com> <84dead720511260449u165a7bf2x1bd41e06e3a8efaf@mail.gmail.com> <200511261346.26050.josh@tcbug.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Josh Paetzel wrote: > On Saturday 26 November 2005 06:49 am, Joseph Koshy wrote: [ ... ] >>The steps are the same, but the naming pattern for the tags >>differs between src/ and ports (src uses RELENG_N_M, ports/ >>uses RELEASE_X_Y_Z*). > > I thought the tag for ports was . It is, in the sense that ports does not maintain multiple branches. However, when a release is produced, the ports tree at that time is tagged, so you could refer back to it if you needed to. Basicly, using a RELEASE_X_Y_Z tag would give you the ports tree which you'd get from the ISO image, which is probably not what most users want when trying to update their ports (ie, they'd miss any of the updates which have been released since then). -- -Chuckhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4388F81F.4030009>