Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:01:11 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: David Schultz <das@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: UFS Subdirectory limit. Message-ID: <868y49w5lk.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4244EAFD.1030304@samsco.org> References: <200503260011.aa53448@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <20050326031018.GB41481@VARK.MIT.EDU> <4244EAFD.1030304@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> writes: > It would be much more worthwhile to introduce > a UFS3 that uses a more efficient directory layout (B-tree?) to provide > real value to increasing the nlink limitation. It would be even more worthwile to simply adopt an existing well- designed and well-tested file system, such as IBM JFS. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868y49w5lk.fsf>