Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 19:27:49 -0500 From: Parv <parv@pair.com> To: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> Cc: mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Buying a laptop. (HP, Compaq, or Gateway) Message-ID: <20050102002749.GA830@holestein.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <41D6F77A.1030905@ultra-secure.de> References: <41D5911A.6080403@acm.org> <41D60825.3000802@pacific.net.sg> <41D6F77A.1030905@ultra-secure.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <41D6F77A.1030905@ultra-secure.de>,
wrote Rainer Duffner thusly...
>
> >FreeBSD is not as good as Windows in a single point: power
> >consumption.
>
> It's even worse than Linux (SuSE 9.2). At least on my
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> Fujitsu-Siemens E8010.
First i thought FreeBSD is worse than SuSe in power management.
> But SuSE totally drops the ball in the ACPI-departement. ...
Reading rest of the paragraph shows that you meant to say that SuSe
is actually worse (in comparison to FreeBSD or Windows).
- Parv
--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050102002749.GA830>