Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:49:43 +0100 From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, JG <jarek@adeon.lublin.pl>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_W=F6rner?= <arne_woerner@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: slow tar performance on fbsd5 Message-ID: <43524C67.9040503@algroup.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20051014120728.O22507@fledge.watson.org> References: <134970360.20050825104636@adeon.lublin.pl> <20050825092210.25239.qmail@web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1476333643.20050825224149@adeon.lublin.pl> <434F7EBA.1090206@algroup.co.uk> <20051014120728.O22507@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Ben Laurie wrote: > >> JG wrote: >> >>>> Now I say, what about >>>> # cpio -i < mysql-m.tgz >>>> (assuming that mysql-m.tgz is in "tar" format)? >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> idea is good, but the result is the same :/ >> >> >> The filesystem is _much_ slower in 5 than it is in 4. You can >> benchmark it with postmark (in the ports tree) - the difference is huge. > > > If you haven't tried 6.x yet, please do, and see if that improves the > situation. And if you run into problems, please report ASAP so we can > try to get them fixed before we release. :-) Hmmm... all of my 5.x systems are live, so this is a bit risky for me! -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43524C67.9040503>