Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:29:59 -0400
From:      Coleman Kane <cokane@freebsd.org>
To:        Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6
Message-ID:  <20060423022959.GA20915@pint.candc.home>
In-Reply-To: <6498375.1145629932728.JavaMail.pibu@Z1DROPOFF>
References:  <20060419040716.4F26116A45F@hub.freebsd.org> <20060419095207.GC19339@wjv.com> <44462C07.4030903@centtech.com> <444634C1.9080206@centtech.com> <44464BBF.5040801@centtech.com> <32256.194.179.68.110.1145535362.squirrel@webmail.loquefaltaba.com> <4447B876.4010606@centtech.com> <346a80220604202019g3e3aaea5lfe19bcabaaf65c1d@mail.gmail.com> <6498375.1145629932728.JavaMail.pibu@Z1DROPOFF>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:32:33PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> 
> 
> This looks good. I only wonder about two things now:
> 
> - Should we also have a line for the actual colors used too?  Or is that 
> going too crazy?
> 
> - Does it meet style(9)?  I'm wondering about line lengths now.
> 
> Other than that, do we have general consensus that these do what they 
> claim?  Any outstanding issues that haven't been addressed?
> 
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> 

It looks like freebsd.org (actually SpamCop) might finally be blocking 
gmail now :(...

I sent the following and it got bounced:

There was a small defect in the recent version of this script that
caused the line width to be too big on the syscons console. I modified
it and posted it at:
http://www.cokane.org/files/rc_fancy-cokane3.patch

--
coleman kane



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060423022959.GA20915>