Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 01:10:29 +0100 From: "Joao Barros" <joao.barros@gmail.com> To: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com> Cc: "Dr. Rich Murphey" <Rich@whiteoaklabs.com>, performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0 Message-ID: <70e8236f0605291710r70a32df4yfcfdba18d1bbb0a9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44788DB2.6070709@rogers.com> References: <20060525174211.46064.qmail@web36315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4475F75C.4090908@rogers.com> <447879D3.1070204@WhiteOakLabs.com> <44788DB2.6070709@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/27/06, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> wrote: > Dr. Rich Murphey wrote: > > I get 25 to 30MB/sec between FreeBSD 6.0 and Windows XP > > clients with tcp.inflight disabled and interrupt polling enabled > > on a 1gb link without jumbo frames. > > > > The various Linux distributions do about the same on this hardware - > > 3ware striped raid arrays, dual xeon, and 2Gb ram. > > > > in smb.conf I'm using: > > socket options =3D TCP_NODELAY > > strict locking =3D no > > use sendfile =3D yes > > > > Adding the last two options of my setup increased the upload rate by > about 2MB/s, with peaks totaling to 20MB/s. The download rate has not > been effected however. I went from 7.5MB/s up to 9.3MB/s on a 100FD connection just by adding that same last 2 options, I only had "socket options =3D IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY" Thanks Rich! > > > 6.1 should be easier to tune in that tcp.inflight is selectively > > disabled by default for low latency (LAN) connections. > > I am using -CURRENT here, disabling net.inet.tcp.inflight improves the > download rate by 2MB/s! > How old is that CURRENT? I believe that shouldn't happen after Andre's commit back in March. I can't see any difference toggling inflight on or off. --=20 Joao Barros
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70e8236f0605291710r70a32df4yfcfdba18d1bbb0a9>