Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:56:10 -0500 (EST)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        Peter Edwards <peadar@freebsd.org>
Cc:        David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: libpthread problem + possible solution
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0612172352170.9156@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <200612160900.54707.davidxu@freebsd.org>
References:  <34cb7c840612151000s4a3e1f2dvd71a60d66cf7c4be@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0612151510130.26062@sea.ntplx.net> <200612160900.54707.davidxu@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, David Xu wrote:

> On Saturday 16 December 2006 04:11, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Peter Edwards wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've a problem when a process uses:
>>>       libpthread
>>>       detached threads
>>>       mixed bound/unbound threads
>>>       suspended threads  (a la pthread_resume_np())
>>>
>>> whereby some newly created suspended threads don't get scheduled.
>>> I think I've tracked it down, so if someone could review the
>>> reasoning, I'd be grateful.
>>
>> I'm away for a few days, so I'd appreciate you waiting until
>> early next week -- unless David Xu looks at it and gives it
>> the ok.
> I will review it.

I looked at the patch and it looks OK to me.  Go ahead and
commit unless David had some comments to it that I haven't
seen.

-- 
DE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0612172352170.9156>