Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:10:40 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regression in 7.0BETA2: unionfs and cd9660 Message-ID: <20071117221040.GA4665@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <fhnmg4$q6u$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <fhnmg4$q6u$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-11-17 22:29, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm reporting a regression in recent RELENG_7, it was present (and I've > reported it) on BETA2, and I sadly confirm that it's also present in > BETA3. The problem is that cd9660 doesn't want to be the underlying > layer for unionfs. > > How to repeat: > > Boot a system with root on cd9660 (e.g. "LiveCD"), then create a > UFS-based md/mfs, then try to mount it via unionfs over (e.g.) /etc: > > # <...make a ram-drive / memory file system on /tmp> > # mount_unionfs /tmp /etc > mount_unionfs: /etc: operation not supported by device > > This worked ok with BETA1 and even -CURRENT versions, and I've located > the breaking point somewhere between: > > #*default date=2007.11.07.00.00.00 > # > #*default date=2007.11.08.00.00.00 > > I don't know if the date is local or UTC, [...] FWIW, if these are dates used as -D 'arg' in cvs(1), then they are UTC.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071117221040.GA4665>