Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:01:50 -0700 From: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> To: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: TX Multiqueue? Message-ID: <b1fa29170709221701m3c13cddakd83c9550905b8bd8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0709221656n4aa62776y488c7f2da262c9f6@mail.gmail.com> References: <2a41acea0709221656n4aa62776y488c7f2da262c9f6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
My ethng branch supports multiple rx and tx queues. -Kip On 9/22/07, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote: > Our newest E1000 nic, the 82575, and the Oplin 10G hardware are capable of > multiple queues both on the receive and the send side. On the receive end for > the Oplin driver the queues actually help distribute interrupts and improve > performance without any special support in the stack. > > I have been asked about multiple queues on the TX side, embedded appliance > type system builders for instance are interested I suppose for > priority queueing. > Is anyone working on this right now, and if not does this sound like something > anyone is interested in doing? > > I would like to see MQ on both TX and RX that drivers could use if able. > > Jack > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170709221701m3c13cddakd83c9550905b8bd8>