Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:12:18 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is curthread always valid in a VOP call? Message-ID: <20080831061218.GJ2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0808301922050.21141@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0808301922050.21141@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YtWd7p+F4osuzCU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 07:23:07PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > Since VOP_GETATTR() and VOP_SETATTR() lost the thread argument in=20 > -current, I did the obvious and used "curthread" instead. Is this > safe to do? Yes. Does the change forced you to use curthread often ? --YtWd7p+F4osuzCU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAki6NkIACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jR3gCdFHsr5WxcTzEZP2lSajwD05/K PWkAoIRUnPbz8GUVsls2OKBpShadsXR+ =H9tj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YtWd7p+F4osuzCU+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080831061218.GJ2038>