Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:20:03 +0000
From:      "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@incunabulum.net>
To:        Gavin Atkinson <gavin@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
Subject:   Re: smbmsg(8): slave address confusion?
Message-ID:  <4928AFC3.40703@incunabulum.net>
In-Reply-To: <1227286112.40570.12.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk>
References:  <4926BDE5.5020708@icyb.net.ua>	<20081121161629.GJ99866@uriah.heep.sax.de> <1227286112.40570.12.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> I believe this is the case, yes.  See for example, PR kern/100513.  It
> appears that some frivers treat the adfdress one way, and others treat
> it the other.
>   

I can confirm this from recent commercial work I had to do involving smb(4).

thanks,
BMS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4928AFC3.40703>