Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:20:03 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@incunabulum.net> To: Gavin Atkinson <gavin@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Subject: Re: smbmsg(8): slave address confusion? Message-ID: <4928AFC3.40703@incunabulum.net> In-Reply-To: <1227286112.40570.12.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> References: <4926BDE5.5020708@icyb.net.ua> <20081121161629.GJ99866@uriah.heep.sax.de> <1227286112.40570.12.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gavin Atkinson wrote: > I believe this is the case, yes. See for example, PR kern/100513. It > appears that some frivers treat the adfdress one way, and others treat > it the other. > I can confirm this from recent commercial work I had to do involving smb(4). thanks, BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4928AFC3.40703>