Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:25:49 +0900 (JST)
From:      Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
To:        mav@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Do we still need ATA disk CHS addressing?
Message-ID:  <20090809.202549.27838630.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A7DF076.4070203@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4A7DF076.4070203@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <4A7DF076.4070203@FreeBSD.org>
Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> writes:

> While preparing wrapping ATA(4) low-level drivers code into CAM SIM, I
> would like to remove CHS addressing support to make code cleaner. CHS
> addressing is officially declared obsoleted and replaced by LBA. Since
> ATA/ATAPI-6 specification (October 2001) it is even no longer
> documented.
> 
> Have anybody seen ATA drive without LBA support in last years?
> Any other objections against removing it?

PC98 uses CHS addressing because the internal interface works for very
old HDD only, so I hope it remains if possible.  But if you need a lot
of works for CHS support, I agree to remove it.

---
TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090809.202549.27838630.nyan>