Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 01:01:17 +0100 From: krad <kraduk@googlemail.com> To: "'Freddie Cash'" <fjwcash@gmail.com>, <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Request for opinions - gvinum or ccd? Message-ID: <C3E617A51315419EADE74238D68B81ED@uk.tiscali.intl> In-Reply-To: <b269bc570906061316g37290b5q910da0d3ec266c98@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090530175239.GA25604@logik.internal.network><20090530144354.2255f722@bhuda.mired.org><20090530191840.GA68514@logik.internal.network><20090530162744.5d77e9d1@bhuda.mired.org><A5BB2D2B836A4438B1B7BD8420FCC6A3@uk.tiscali.intl><h0ehhv$sic$1@ger.gmane.org> <b269bc570906061316g37290b5q910da0d3ec266c98@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>We remade the pool using 3x 8-drive raidz2 vdevs, and performance has >been great (400 MBytes/s write, almost 3 GBytes/s sequential read, 800 >MBytes/s random read). Yep that corresponds with what we saw, although we were getting a little higher write rates with our 46 drive configuration
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C3E617A51315419EADE74238D68B81ED>