Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:57:29 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAM rules inside pam.d Message-ID: <86k579h2vq.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <670f29e20902270618m23eed4acg15a8a3e7b43fe327@mail.gmail.com> (Ivan Grover's message of "Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:48:41 %2B0530") References: <670f29e20902240717m49f53bfx67166c151c01384b@mail.gmail.com> <86eixnfwr2.fsf@ds4.des.no> <670f29e20902270618m23eed4acg15a8a3e7b43fe327@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@gmail.com> writes: > I have my PAM rules for my service as > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > auth required pam_stack.so service=3Dsystem-auth > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so What is pam_stack supposed to do? > I have checked the username, password passed to PAM module by changing the > sources of pam_nologin.so, they are proper. I didnt had sources for > pam_unix, so iam not able to detect the exact problem. Uh, they're in the source tree along with everything else. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k579h2vq.fsf>