Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:03:38 +0000 From: mdf@FreeBSD.org To: Alexander Kabaev <kan@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r212478 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <AANLkTikgzNrak%2BLi0Xj0wrjBOeVvpX7e_md1wuxEDT0H@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201009111942.o8BJgocS032974@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201009111942.o8BJgocS032974@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Alexander Kabaev <kan@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: kan > Date: Sat Sep 11 19:42:50 2010 > New Revision: 212478 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/212478 > > Log: > Add missing pointer increment to sbuf_cat. > > Modified: > head/sys/kern/subr_sbuf.c > > Modified: head/sys/kern/subr_sbuf.c > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/kern/subr_sbuf.c Sat Sep 11 18:55:00 2010 (r212477) > +++ head/sys/kern/subr_sbuf.c Sat Sep 11 19:42:50 2010 (r212478) > @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ sbuf_cat(struct sbuf *s, const char *str > return (-1); > > while (*str != '\0') { > - sbuf_put_byte(*str, s); > + sbuf_put_byte(*str++, s); > if (s->s_error != 0) > return (-1); > } D'oh! Yeah, this looks right. I guess the sbuf functions that ran when I tested didn't use sbuf_cat. Sorry, matthew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikgzNrak%2BLi0Xj0wrjBOeVvpX7e_md1wuxEDT0H>