Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:13:46 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED ports/graphics Makefile ports/graphics/linux-tiff Makefile distinfo.i386 pkg-descr pkg-plist.i386 Message-ID: <4E9B8F5A.6050408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E9B144A.3050303@passap.ru> References: <201110150045.p9F0jStN040351@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E9B144A.3050303@passap.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/16/2011 10:28, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 15.10.2011 04:45, Doug Barton пишет: >> dougb 2011-10-15 00:45:28 UTC >> >> Log: >> Grant graphics/linux-tiff a stay of execution >> >> Due to the way that linux dependencies are recorded my greps for the >> portname, category/portname, etc. didn't discover that on RELENG_7 >> this version of the port is still heavily depended on. Neither did >> my building INDEX on more recent versions of FreeBSD. >> >> So bring it back for now, with the plan to mark those ports that >> depend on it BROKEN conditional on OSVERSION. > > Thanks for moving the port back. > > However can I ask everybody to consult with the maintainer before > touching a port? Thanks. Not only have I made my plans widely public, but I sent explicit mail to all maintainers detailing my plans on 2011-09-03, along with various followups. You can see yours at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2011-September/009121.html. Not that I blame you for my mistake, but I did rely to some extent on the extensive silence from the maintainers that did not respond as an implicit, "I don't see any problems with that plan." Doug
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E9B8F5A.6050408>