Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:30:30 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/162498: www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 is vulnerable Message-ID: <4EBF2BC6.4030709@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgn1RD244Tgv9MTCWVRq6g2jJJB2t4UP%2BcPRMEx1-7Ow_w@mail.gmail.com> References: <201111120805.pAC85GIa060413@freefall.freebsd.org> <20158.64151.620159.609277@gromit.timing.com> <CAF6rxgn1RD244Tgv9MTCWVRq6g2jJJB2t4UP%2BcPRMEx1-7Ow_w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/12/2011 15:38, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:00 PM, John Hein <jhein@symmetricom.com> wrote: >> miwi@FreeBSD.org wrote at 08:05 +0000 on Nov 12, 2011: >> > Synopsis: www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 is vulnerable >> > >> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed >> > State-Changed-By: miwi >> > State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 12 08:05:15 UTC 2011 >> > State-Changed-Why: >> > please update your portstree, its already committed since few ours. >> > >> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162498 >> >> It's still showing that it's vulnerable (looks like a vuxml problem)... > > My fault. I put a vuln.xml entry saying anything less than 11.x.y.z > was vulnerable. Unfortunately I'm not going to be around to fix this > until tomorrow. If someone wants to fix that it would be good. ;) Done. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2011-November/229879.html Doug -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EBF2BC6.4030709>