Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:03:03 GMT From: Achilleas Mantzios <panixgr@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: java/155967: javavm wrapper insists on diablo Message-ID: <201103270903.p2R9330d071452@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201103270910.p2R9ABq6069397@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 155967
>Category: java
>Synopsis: javavm wrapper insists on diablo
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: freebsd-java
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: update
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Sun Mar 27 09:10:10 UTC 2011
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Achilleas Mantzios
>Release: 8.2-RELEASE
>Organization:
home
>Environment:
FreeBSD panix.internal.net 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Wed Mar 23 13:27:15 EET 2011 doroot@panix.internal.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>Description:
Javavm wrapper relies on /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.java.mk to decide on the java vm to use. It seems that /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.java.mk prefers diablo over the openjdk port.
>How-To-Repeat:
Just try to install openjdk. diablo 1.6 will be installed as a build dependency, openjdk will be installed after, and the system will default to diablo, whereas the user's intention was to use openjdk.
>Fix:
apply the following patch to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.java.mk
*** bsd.java.mk.orig 2011-03-27 08:33:34.000000000 +0300
--- bsd.java.mk 2011-03-27 08:42:33.000000000 +0300
***************
*** 212,217 ****
--- 212,219 ----
# Enforce preferred Java ports according to OS
. if (${OSVERSION} >= 600000 && ${OSVERSION} < 800000)
_JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS+= JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_FREEBSD_JDK_1_6
+ . else if (${OSVERSION} >= 800000)
+ _JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS+= JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_OPENJDK_JDK_1_6
. else
_JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS+= JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_BSDJAVA_JDK_1_6
. endif
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201103270903.p2R9330d071452>