Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:01:42 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: mdf@FreeBSD.org Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r228625 - head/usr.bin/csup Message-ID: <4EED2D66.3000304@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAMBSHm9=0%2BZ%2BC687097WW_mGaNUpJ7Tbo7SZa4XLr7g0L2ecOQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201112171314.pBHDEjtQ060509@svn.freebsd.org> <CAMBSHm9cBbCxZ9MvgPvKgYfSxPSpeofgTq0NnJo=e3tR5idxEQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EED0F99.2020306@FreeBSD.org> <CAMBSHm9=0%2BZ%2BC687097WW_mGaNUpJ7Tbo7SZa4XLr7g0L2ecOQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2011-12-18 00:49, mdf@FreeBSD.org wrote: ... > Also, long long is a bit of a hack that came in before C99 > standardized on a few wider types, and the PRIu64 macros are really > hideous. I agree they're ugly, but C99 should simply have defined length modifiers for int64_t and friends, then the PRI macros could have been avoided. (Although not without backwards compatibility problems, but you would have those anyway. :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EED2D66.3000304>