Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:54 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: irc/xchat: limit icon blinking time Message-ID: <4FE67152.8080008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnnDknX6=QN6jUpGLx1CeG6jHCn8CkcaCrXap0dYJO2og@mail.gmail.com> References: <4FE2315C.50706@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxg=W=QhJ0%2BLJ_pudZmJo5yTWoWQj77NWKjWXx1sP1pLzbw@mail.gmail.com> <4FE2F673.2080201@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgme9QoKKrictteBaipGKDq5ZTycL9d6_f2X4XVYNgyQFQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FE518FB.1000802@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgneJR0ObpPTnX0EX7T82cbYRA5gq_66_qYAeqOaQqUQGw@mail.gmail.com> <4FE566CB.406@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgnnDknX6=QN6jUpGLx1CeG6jHCn8CkcaCrXap0dYJO2og@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 06/23/2012 14:18, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 22 June 2012 23:48, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 06/22/2012 20:14, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> I don't oppose build patches for FreeBSD when the program otherwise
>>> works, but the ports collection is not a software development
>>> repository.
>>
>> There are a non-trivial number of examples to the contrary.
>
> Such as?
Several of my ports, to start with. Which is why I'm concerned at your
attempt to change policy by fiat.
>> Not to
>> mention that there is actually no reason for us not to have our own
>> stuff in ports.
>
> Our own stuff is completely unrelated. The question at hand is do we
> continue development of third party software by means of patches to
> the ports tree?
And the answer has always been, "Yes." I have no idea where you got any
other idea.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE67152.8080008>