Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:22:06 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, arrowdodger <6yearold@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Using symbolic execution for analyzing scheduler performance? Message-ID: <CAJ-VmonMS3QCNc5wbdfiPjMd4Or0CpNUpxa15QDz4Q4bMPHT1A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EFF8449.1060800@freebsd.org> References: <CALH631=v690XayAix=vX7NTyj%2BSnML%2BMpzFC6i0Ms0Bg%2BEaKTw@mail.gmail.com> <4EFE5806.3090000@freebsd.org> <CALH631n-V8kMFm=STRwM__53otGXaVqa9nwoAM-VA4-Qfx=RzA@mail.gmail.com> <4EFF8449.1060800@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31 December 2011 13:53, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Russian. > > > there are a lot of russian developers so you should be able to find someone > if you need explanations in Russian.. There's definitely plenty of russians. And they have a habit of doing cool things. So who knows, you may have come up with a good idea that just needs a bit of effort. Also, learning by "trial by fire" is an acceptable way to learn kernel development. :) (I did something similar, blame Julian.) Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonMS3QCNc5wbdfiPjMd4Or0CpNUpxa15QDz4Q4bMPHT1A>