Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 18:01:52 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Hooman Fazaeli <hoomanfazaeli@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Jason Wolfe <nitroboost@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Intel 82574L interface wedging - em7.3.2/8.2-STABLE Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=2BWQd3an3TT9-YZrLPYDoHs7ZJET360HMQijOWPavOQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F5B2E0E.10201@gmail.com> References: <CAAAm0r3Qj%2B2rf8cx54bcyAXGQezcE8J=xXYPq4W-jDy75r8qew@mail.gmail.com> <CAAAm0r281Bs-yKbf6ZjCTGPLf0voh=T10GpBc3e-e%2B=10AvU9g@mail.gmail.com> <4F5B2E0E.10201@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 March 2012 02:33, Hooman Fazaeli <hoomanfazaeli@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Jason > > With a link_irq of 4, I still guess your problem is snd_buf filling up > during > a temporary link_loss (see: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2011-November/030424.html). > > I use a patched version of e1000 which addresses this issue and > works good for me but it is based on 7.2.3 and I have just tested in > on 7.3-RELEASE. Are you able to post the patch here? Maybe Jack can look at what's going on and apply it to the latest intel ethernet driver. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=2BWQd3an3TT9-YZrLPYDoHs7ZJET360HMQijOWPavOQ>