Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:41:32 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>, Mike Harding <mvharding@gmail.com> Subject: Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance Message-ID: <5222E19C.9040402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokesYVnYJUnNgULKwL-wqb_-SqqYi=3KUSCGbHNVgOOUw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALRn2n_2tUc0vPCFpgmAjYRm1=7KB5sA3A%2BxQqcc=ye-S1-0LA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmom970ZBLPLWWTomkKtX1w-Fi3cj5qva1_ODcx22nqEXfA@mail.gmail.com> <CALRn2n9G1%2BBS8KVUc_RFZj-snM3FVJvsEEcnWqv-GF82=CqS6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomWMhQNU1w0eWdwrKYz2fuZ5xZimgxQWUEkPqaQcgYkjw@mail.gmail.com> <CALRn2n_e2Uu4Y2aHUSP=6_aQDPeCk_OkrCxiFWaD0BxmbgP4-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokesYVnYJUnNgULKwL-wqb_-SqqYi=3KUSCGbHNVgOOUw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 01/09/2013 02:40 Adrian Chadd said the following: > > > > On 31 August 2013 10:35, Mike Harding <mvharding@gmail.com > <mailto:mvharding@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I've tracked this down to a single line, details in > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632. Basically, the code is > now doing a 'sti, hlt' vs. a 'sti' in some code that is only supposed to run > if idle is disabled. Given that 'hlt' is the idle instruction, this doesn't > seem right. > > > Wow, nice! > > Avg - can we get this fixed? Or just revert this! Thank you for trying to be helpful. But let's not jump to conclusions. BTW, I am following up on the problem in the PR. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5222E19C.9040402>