Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:00:24 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: including generated documentation with source Message-ID: <86hal0ebnr.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <alpine.NEB.2.02.1302220807360.343@t1.m.reedmedia.net> (Jeremy C. Reed's message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:25:18 -0600 (CST)") References: <alpine.NEB.2.02.1302111751360.27181@t1.m.reedmedia.net> <867gmdhnu9.fsf@ds4.des.no> <alpine.NEB.2.02.1302220807360.343@t1.m.reedmedia.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
"Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net> writes: > Thank you for the examples. This is similar to what I already do, but > has one advantage that I don't currently have: its source includes the > generation tool (misc/gendoc.pl). What happens if a make clean is done > and no perl is available to regenerate? The build fails. However, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect people to have Perl installed, and in any case, there is a configure switch to disable the documentation. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.nohelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hal0ebnr.fsf>