Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:32:05 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: dinoex@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: security/openssl speed issues Message-ID: <20130827153205.GA48196@roberto02-aw.eurocontrol.fr>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Dirk ! As I got a new machine with the AES-NI crypto extensions, I'm getting interested with it and as you may have seen, I've already merged into stable/9 two changesets for AES-NI support in GELI & cryptodev. Now, I'm trying to measure the impact of said AES extentions, I tumbled on a very weird difference in behaviour between our base system openssl and the one in ports. /usr/bin/openssl: OpenSSL 0.9.8y 5 Feb 2013 /usr/local/bin/openssl: OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013 The one is base is not supposed to have cryptodev (and aesni) support at all as it was added apparently in 1.0.1. Fine. 1. Trying to run both on a machine without the AES-NI extensions, I should have similar results in running speed tests but: 1181 [17:18] roberto@centre:/usr/ports> /usr/bin/openssl speed aes-256-cbc ... OpenSSL 0.9.8y 5 Feb 2013 (9.1-BETA1) built on: date not available options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(ptr,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx) compiler: cc available timing options: USE_TOD HZ=128 [sysconf value] timing function used: getrusage The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed. type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-256 cbc 58919.92k 62134.88k 62611.08k 62776.47k 62910.03k and 1182 [17:19] roberto@centre:/usr/ports> /usr/local/bin/openssl speed aes-256-cbc ... OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013 built on: Sun Jul 28 16:36:48 CEST 2013 options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx) compiler: cc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB_SHARED -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -pthread -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -Wa,--noexecstack -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -DMD32_REG_T=int -Wall -O -pipe -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed. type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-256 cbc 38790.95k 41415.66k 42009.00k 42257.07k 42213.38k Wow, how would you explain the 37% (in the worng direction!) difference? Is there something I could add/change in the port's configuration to fix that? 2. I have another machine with the AES-NI extensions, with a E3-1220 CPU. If I load crypto, aesni and cryptodev, it is indentified as using them: cryptosoft0: <software crypto> on motherboard aesni0: <AES-CBC,AES-XTS> on motherboard Results of openssl speed with the base one are better as you would expect, CPU is faster: % /usr/bin/openssl speed aes-256-cbc ... OpenSSL 0.9.8x 10 May 2012 (9.1-RELEASE) built on: date not available options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(ptr,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) blowfish(idx) compiler: cc available timing options: USE_TOD HZ=128 [sysconf value] timing function used: getrusage The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed. type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-256 cbc 125404.07k 129849.19k 130514.37k 131242.71k 131164.72k but... % /usr/local/bin/openssl speed -engine cryptodev aes-256-cbc engine "cryptodev" set. ... OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012 built on: Mon Apr 8 19:45:18 UTC 2013 options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx) compiler: cc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB_SHARED -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -pthread -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -Wa,--noexecstack -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIOS -O3 -DMD32_REG_T=int -Wall -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed. type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-256 cbc 71203.16k 74667.39k 75631.27k 75975.34k 76090.03k Still 42% diff and no "aesni" usage at all!? I'm guessing we have an issue there... Thanks, -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.net In memoriam to Ondine, our 2nd child: http://ondine.keltia.net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130827153205.GA48196>