Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 18:41:06 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: tcltk@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Tcl/Tk moves to the USES framework Message-ID: <20130922164106.GB25610@gahrfit.gahr.ch> In-Reply-To: <20130920171736.GH1560@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20130919120004.GL86832@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20130919124623.GZ1560@albert.catwhisker.org> <20130919131640.GM86832@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20130919192446.GB1560@albert.catwhisker.org> <20130919195016.GQ86832@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20130920171736.GH1560@albert.catwhisker.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 2013-Sep-20, 10:17, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 09:50:16PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > ... > > Yep, there was an issue on != CURRENT. It's fixed as of r327631. > > .... > > OK; I have a working patch for astro/gpsman. > > However, as I was working on it, I found that the patch in ports/180642 > (to update the port from 6.4.4 to 6.4.4.1, from 18 July) had not > yet been committed. > > In checking <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=180642&cat=>, > it appears that wen heping noted an issue the following day attempting > the build with "NOPORTDOCS=yes", but his message had been mis-addressed, > and was never sent to me -- so I was unaware of the issue until a few > minutes ago. > > As I have never attempted to set "NOPORTDOCS=yes", I'm fairly sure that > the issue encountered is not caused by any recent change in the port > (and I may need some help to figure out what sort of evasive action to > take; I'm at work right now, and can't take much time on this at the > moment). > > So... should I: > > * Submit a new PR, replacing ports/180642, addressing both the 6.4.4 -> > 6.4.4.1 upgrade and the "USES+= tk..."? > > * Create a new PR, replacing ports/180642, addressing the 6.4.4 -> > 6.4.4.1 upgrade, the "NOPORTDOCS=yes" issue, and the "USES+= tk..."? > > * Submit a new PR for just "USES+= tk..."? And another new one for the > "NOPORTDOCS=yes" issue? > > * Something else? David, please take your time, there's no need to hurry for the USES+=tk thing. The old mechanism is going to stay around until all ports are updated, so... If I were you, I'd take care of everything at once and submit a single PR. If you do so, please feel free to ping me back and I'll take care of it. Best, -- Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlI/HaIACgkQwMJqmJVx947kMQCfckFSZk8G+WgTlloVZJHDbUyK AmMAoI9bt524NOPmXn47faotUvSL+QmT =RlAb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130922164106.GB25610>